SQM QoS su OpenWRT su Tim Hub con Ansuel GUI
GioAda
Se può essere utile ho fatto generare un log di debug:
Fri Aug 12 19:09:01 CEST 2022: Starting.
Starting SQM script: layer_cake.qos on pppoe-wan, in: 95000 Kbps, out: 19000 Kbps
Failed to find act_ipt. Maybe it is a built in module ?
Failed to find sch_ingress. Maybe it is a built in module ?
Failed to find act_mirred. Maybe it is a built in module ?
Failed to find cls_fw. Maybe it is a built in module ?
Failed to find cls_u32. Maybe it is a built in module ?
/sbin/ip link add name TMP_IFB_4_SQM type ifb
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev TMP_IFB_4_SQM root cake
/sbin/ip link set dev TMP_IFB_4_SQM down
/sbin/ip link delete TMP_IFB_4_SQM type ifb
/sbin/ip link add name ifb4pppoe-wan type ifb
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev pppoe-wan root
RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev pppoe-wan root cake bandwidth 19000kbit diffserv3
/sbin/ip link add name TMP_IFB_4_SQM type ifb
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev TMP_IFB_4_SQM ingress
/sbin/ip link set dev TMP_IFB_4_SQM down
/sbin/ip link delete TMP_IFB_4_SQM type ifb
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev pppoe-wan handle ffff: ingress
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev pppoe-wan handle ffff: ingress
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev ifb4pppoe-wan root
RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev ifb4pppoe-wan root cake bandwidth 95000kbit diffserv3 besteffort wash
/sbin/ip link set dev ifb4pppoe-wan up
/usr/sbin/tc filter add dev pppoe-wan parent ffff: protocol all prio 10 u32 match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1 action mirred egres>
layer_cake.qos was started on pppoe-wan successfully
- Modificato
Forse ho risolto, ho messo in queue settings fq_codel e simple.qos invece di cake e piece_of_cake.qos, in quanto ho letto che anche ad altri col DGA4132 dava un problema simile. Invece mettendo quelli di default funziona, anche se l'upload nonostante gli dica di limitarlo a 19Mb/s poi diventa 15. farò un po' di prove e vedrò con quali configurazioni mi trovo meglio
EDIT: con il corretto valore di overhead torna a circa 19
Che strumento hai usato per fare il test?
